Artists' Statement:
This work attempts
to place itself in the 1920's in Chicago, during the Prohibition era.
Though it is pre-Depression, it is set in a poorer area of town, in a
family with no father and only the oldest son working. Originally, we had
the idea that this would be a Mormon family, but after doing some research, we
found that the probability of a Mormon family living in Chicago in
the 1920's was very little, and decided instead to base the family's belief
system after those commonly held by the members of the Women's Temperance
Union, typically very religious women whose main concern about Prohibition was
providing protection and empowerment to women, rather than restricting the
rights of individuals to buy alcohol.
When we first
envisioned the story, we had a clear beginning and a clear end. We wanted
Charles to be working, without his mother's knowledge, at a speakeasy, which
would clearly be at odds with his mother's belief, as well as his own core
beliefs, and in the end, we wanted him to reconcile those beliefs. What
we found was the lack of a strong conflict. Originally, we had Charles
finally just telling his mother, and the two of them having a conversation, but
the tension was low and there was no interesting conflict. The rally and
riot were added to increase the stakes, as well as the decision to make Charles
the sole provider for the family, instead of having a father figure, who was
absentee from the script, providing some sort of fall-back. Also, in the
development of the script, we toned up the tension in the end between Charles
and his mother, instead of having a cheesy resolution, so that the burden would
ultimately rest on Charles to make his final decision.
To place the script
in the setting, a large part depended on proper dialogue. Appropriate
slang was used for the age, though we didn't want to overwhelm the reader with
unfamiliar jargon, just using enough to give the dialogue authenticity.
The script reading done in class was a great check on this, especially
when appropriate accents were utilized while reading, and helped us to nail the
dialogue down.
It was interesting
to construct a narrative that isn't drawing from personal stories, or those
shared by others, like many of the examples shown in class. Authenticity
was a little harder to achieve, but in the end the result is something that is
definitely plausible, and could perhaps echo situations that existed in that
time period.
No comments:
Post a Comment